An Eye For An Eye And A Tooth For A Tooth Strongly Disagree Disagree

These words appear in the king james english translation.

An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth strongly disagree disagree. You have heard that it was said an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth but i say to you do not resist the one who is evil. An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth was part of hammurabi s code. An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth saying said to show that you believe if someone does something wrong that person should be punished by having the same thing done to them.

Strongly disagree taxpayers should not be expected to prop up any theatres or museums that cannot survive on a commercial basis. This type of thinking only fuels revenge and never allows for a finality to problems. I think the original idea was no more than an eye for an eye. The full quotation from hammurabi s code reads if a man has destroyed the eye of a man of the gentleman class they shall destroy his eye.

There is a more elaborate version of the clever maxim based on these two phrases. Eye for an eye is not only barbaric but it is irrational. The basic tenant of an eye for an eye is that the punishment must fit the crime. Give your reason for whichever you choose.

An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. All authority should be questioned. This idiom originated in the ancient mesopotamian empire during hammurabi s rule in the 18th century bc. Disagree 1st strongly disagree 2nd.

There are many things that need to be looked into as to why people do certain things. An eye for eye and tooth for tooth would lead to a world of the blind and toothless. Strongly agree though i admit i don t take eye for an eye as literally as you do. Eventually people are involved in a fight that.

Eye for eye tooth for tooth. If you knock out someone s tooth it used to be that if the person was poor there was no punishment at all but if the person was rich. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek turn to him the other also. No i disagree with the statement eye for an eye because there is much more that needs to be considered before one thinks that irrationally.